45 E 69th Way

Long Beach, CA 90805

$1,150,000C-

6 bd · 6.0 ba · 3,194 sqft · Built 1953 · MultiFamily · Active · 129 DOM

Cashflow @ list (25.0% down · 7.5%)

• Estimated rent: $12,442/mo
• Mortgage (P&I): −$6,031
• Tax + insurance: −$977
• HOA: −$0
• Vac / Maint / Mgmt: −$2,613
• Net cashflow: $2,821/mo
• Annual: $33,858/yr
• Cap rate: 9.24%
• Cash-on-cash: 10.51%
• DSCR: 1.47
• 1% rule: 1.08%
• Cash to close: $322,000

Investor read

• This is a 5×1.0bd/1.0ba + 1×2.0bd/1.0ba units multifamily listed at $1.15M.
• At list price, monthly cash flow is $3k ($34k/yr) — positive. Per door: $470/mo.
• The deal already cash-flows at list — no discount required.
• Meets the 1% rule at list price ($12k rent vs $1.15M).
• It's been on market 129 days — a 12% lower offer ($1.01M) is reasonable based on typical stale-listing flexibility.
• Recommended offer: $1.01M (12.0% below list) — sets the bar for market timing.
• Local home prices are declining (-3.0%/yr); year-one equity from $8k of loan paydown is wiped out by about $34k of value loss. Plan a longer hold.
• Location reads 67/100 on livability (#319 in CA) — a middle-class / working-renter tenant base. Strengths: amenities A+, commute A+, employment B+; Watch: health & safety C-, crime F, cost of living F.
• Long Beach Unified (urban): math 34% / reading 50% proficiency, ranked #216 of 517 in CA (top 42%) — families likely to look elsewhere, expect single-tenant / working-renter base with shorter leases.
• Watch-outs: built in 1953 — expect roof / HVAC / electrical / plumbing capex.
• Market conditions: Rents rising (+1.9%/yr); 100 active listings in the ZIP; 19,697 units permitted in Los Angeles County in 2024 (9,426 in 5+ unit buildings).
• Los Angeles County population projected at +9% by 2050 — modest demand growth; plan on rents tracking national, not racing it.
• Current owner paid $115k; list at $1.15M implies a 900% gain — meaningful room to come down on a strong offer.
• Cap rate 9.2% vs local median 1.9% in Long Beach — top-decile yield for the area; either an underpriced asset or a hidden risk that comps aren't pricing in. Stress-test before assuming the spread holds.
• At $12,442/mo this rent would consume 203% of the median local household income ($73k/yr) (locally 4834% of renters already pay >50% of income on rent) — very limited rent-growth headroom before tenants either downsize or default.

Questions for listing agent

• It's been on market 129 days. Have you received any prior offers? Is the seller open to a 12% concession, seller financing, or rate buy-down credit?
• Can we see the unit-by-unit rent roll, current vacancy, and any below-market leases? What's the average tenancy length?
• What capital expenditures (roof, boiler, parking lot, exteriors) have been made in the last 5 years, and what's planned in the next 2?
• Built in 1953 — when were the roof, HVAC, electrical panel, plumbing, and water heater last replaced?
• Why hasn't it sold? Are there any deal-killer items the seller is aware of (foundation, flood, title, zoning, code violations)?
• Is there a deadline driving the sale (1031 exchange, divorce, estate, relocation)? That informs how much negotiation room exists.
• Crime grade is F in this area — have there been break-ins, vandalism, or insurance claims at this property in the last 3 years? What carrier currently insures it and at what premium?
• What's the average days-on-market for RENTAL listings here right now (not sales)? A rising rental-DOM trend means longer vacancies and softer asking-rent achievability than the comps imply.