4 bd · 4.0 ba ·
2,266 sqft ·
Built 1963
· MultiFamily
· Active
· 114 DOM
Cashflow @ list (25.0% down · 7.5%)
Estimated rent
$5,591/mo
Mortgage (P&I)
−$3,671
Tax + insurance
−$1,004
HOA
−$0
Vac / Maint / Mgmt
−$1,174
Net cashflow
$-258/mo
Annual
$-3,096/yr
Cap rate
5.85%
Cash-on-cash
-1.58%
DSCR
0.93
1% rule
0.80%
Cash to close
$196,000
Investor read
This is a 3 × 2-bed/1.5-bath units multifamily listed at $700k.
At list price, monthly cash flow is $-258 ($-3k/yr) — negative. Per door: $-86/mo.
To cash-flow at today's rent, offer at most $654k (6.5% below list).
To meet the 1% rule (rent ≥ 1% of price), the offer needs to be $559k (20.1% below list).
It's been on market 114 days — a 9% lower offer ($637k) is reasonable based on typical stale-listing flexibility.
Recommended offer: $559k (20.1% below list) — sets the bar for 1% rule.
Local home prices are declining (-3.0%/yr); year-one equity from $5k of loan paydown is wiped out by about $21k of value loss. Plan a longer hold.
Location reads 71/100 on livability (#218 in CA) — a middle-class / working-renter tenant base. Strengths: amenities A+, commute A+, housing A; Watch: crime F, cost of living F.
Sacramento City Unified (urban): math 32% / reading 43% proficiency, ranked #804 of 1,400 in CA (top 57%) — families likely to look elsewhere, expect single-tenant / working-renter base with shorter leases; 63% free/reduced lunch — lower-income household profile, screen leases tightly.
Zoned schools: Leonardo Da Vinci (797 students, 35% FRL); C. K. Mcclatchy High (2,427 students, 56% FRL) — zoned schools average 45% FRL vs 63% district-wide (18 pts lower); this property's tenant base skews higher-income than the district average.
Market conditions: Rents rising fast (+4.3%/yr); 107 active listings in the ZIP; 1 comparable units currently listed for rent nearby; solid renter incomes; 6,825 units permitted in Sacramento County in 2024 (1,752 in 5+ unit buildings).
Sacramento County population projected at +17% by 2050 — long-run rental-demand tailwind backs the buy-and-hold thesis.
7 sale attempts since 5y ago; this cycle's ask is 30% above the opening price — seller raised mid-cycle; expect resistance to lowballs.
Current owner paid $540k; 30% above their basis — modest negotiation headroom, anchor on the comps not their cost.
Climate carrying-cost: extreme-heat days projected 7→15/yr by 2055 (HVAC capex compounding) — expect insurance premiums to compound above CPI over the hold.
Cap rate 5.9% vs local median 3.0% in Sacramento — top-decile yield for the area; either an underpriced asset or a hidden risk that comps aren't pricing in. Stress-test before assuming the spread holds.
At $5,591/mo this rent would consume 77% of the median local household income ($87k/yr) (locally 1336% of renters already pay >50% of income on rent) — very limited rent-growth headroom before tenants either downsize or default.
Questions for listing agent
What do current leases actually rent for vs. the listed asking? Can we see a recent rent roll and the last 12 months of T-12 income?
It's been on market 114 days. Have you received any prior offers? Is the seller open to a 20% concession, seller financing, or rate buy-down credit?
Can we see the unit-by-unit rent roll, current vacancy, and any below-market leases? What's the average tenancy length?
What capital expenditures (roof, boiler, parking lot, exteriors) have been made in the last 5 years, and what's planned in the next 2?
Built in 1963 — when were the roof, HVAC, electrical panel, plumbing, and water heater last replaced?
Why hasn't it sold? Are there any deal-killer items the seller is aware of (foundation, flood, title, zoning, code violations)?
Is there a deadline driving the sale (1031 exchange, divorce, estate, relocation)? That informs how much negotiation room exists.
Schools are D-rated, which usually means shorter tenancies and higher turnover. Who's the typical renter profile here, and what's been the actual vacancy rate?
CashFlowRE · CFR-KH5Y0DEDW47NXQ
· Data 18 h agocashflowre.app · 2026-05-29