13 bd · 8.0 ba ·
4,200 sqft ·
Built 1936
· MultiFamily
· Active
· 40 DOM
Cashflow @ list (25.0% down · 7.5%)
Estimated rent
$16,283/mo
Mortgage (P&I)
−$7,866
Tax + insurance
−$2,500
HOA
−$0
Vac / Maint / Mgmt
−$3,419
Net cashflow
$2,497/mo
Annual
$29,969/yr
Cap rate
8.29%
Cash-on-cash
7.14%
DSCR
1.32
1% rule
1.09%
Cash to close
$420,000
Investor read
This is a 4 × 3-bed/?-bath units multifamily listed at $1.50M. Condition is rated fair.
At list price, monthly cash flow is $2k ($30k/yr) — positive. Per door: $624/mo.
The deal already cash-flows at list — no discount required.
Meets the 1% rule at list price ($16k rent vs $1.50M).
It's been on market 40 days — a 3% lower offer ($1.46M) is reasonable based on typical stale-listing flexibility.
Recommended offer: $1.46M (3.0% below list) — sets the bar for market timing.
Local home prices are declining (-3.0%/yr); year-one equity from $10k of loan paydown is wiped out by about $45k of value loss. Plan a longer hold.
Location reads 68/100 on livability (#273 in CA) — a middle-class / working-renter tenant base. Strengths: amenities A+, commute A+, employment B; Watch: health & safety C-, crime F, cost of living F.
Los Angeles Unified (urban): math 29% / reading 54% proficiency, ranked #223 of 517 in CA (top 43%) — families likely to look elsewhere, expect single-tenant / working-renter base with shorter leases; 67% free/reduced lunch — lower-income household profile, screen leases tightly.
Zoned schools: Ivanhoe Elementary (429 students, 12% FRL); Thomas Starr King Middle School Film And Media Magnet (1,722 students, 72% FRL); John Marshall Senior High (math 57% / reading 80%, grade B, #133 of 1,170 statewide, top 11%, 1,950 students, 72% FRL) — zoned schools average 52% FRL vs 67% district-wide (15 pts lower); this property's tenant base skews higher-income than the district average.
Zoned-school proficiency averages 68% at this address vs 42% district-wide (+27 pts) — the actual schools serving this property are materially stronger than the Los Angeles Unified average implies; a family-tenant draw the district grade alone would hide.
Watch-outs: built in 1936 — expect roof / HVAC / electrical / plumbing capex.
Market conditions: Rents rising (+2.3%/yr); 163 active listings in the ZIP; solid renter incomes; 19,697 units permitted in Los Angeles County in 2024 (9,426 in 5+ unit buildings).
Los Angeles County population projected at +9% by 2050 — modest demand growth; plan on rents tracking national, not racing it.
Cap rate 8.3% vs local median 2.1% in Los Angeles — top-decile yield for the area; either an underpriced asset or a hidden risk that comps aren't pricing in. Stress-test before assuming the spread holds.
At $4,071/mo per unit this rent would consume 52% of the median local household income ($95k/yr) — very limited rent-growth headroom before tenants either downsize or default.
Questions for listing agent
It's been on market 40 days. Have you received any prior offers? Is the seller open to a 3% concession, seller financing, or rate buy-down credit?
Can we see the unit-by-unit rent roll, current vacancy, and any below-market leases? What's the average tenancy length?
What capital expenditures (roof, boiler, parking lot, exteriors) have been made in the last 5 years, and what's planned in the next 2?
Have any recent inspections been done? Can we get a copy of the seller's disclosures and any deferred-maintenance estimates?
Built in 1936 — when were the roof, HVAC, electrical panel, plumbing, and water heater last replaced?
Is there a deadline driving the sale (1031 exchange, divorce, estate, relocation)? That informs how much negotiation room exists.
Schools are D-rated, which usually means shorter tenancies and higher turnover. Who's the typical renter profile here, and what's been the actual vacancy rate?
Crime grade is F in this area — have there been break-ins, vandalism, or insurance claims at this property in the last 3 years? What carrier currently insures it and at what premium?
Repairs flagged (vision-AI assessment)
Major: roof
— Significant damage visible in the independent image.
Major: exterior siding
— Significant wear and tear visible in the independent image.
Major: landscaping
— Overgrown and in need of maintenance as shown in the independent image.
Major: interior walls/paint
— No photos provided, but the exterior suggests a need for significant interior updates.
Major: HVAC/mechanicals
— No photos provided, but the exterior suggests a need for significant interior updates.
Major: flooring
— No photos provided, but the exterior suggests a need for significant interior updates.
CashFlowRE · CFR-RGQMKD2C97WTNX
· Data 4 weeks agocashflowre.app · 2026-05-29