4 bd · 4.0 ba ·
2,953 sqft ·
Built 1900
· MultiFamily
· Active
· 108 DOM
Cashflow @ list (25.0% down · 7.5%)
Estimated rent
$7,626/mo
Mortgage (P&I)
−$4,218
Tax + insurance
−$2,406
HOA
−$0
Vac / Maint / Mgmt
−$1,601
Net cashflow
$-600/mo
Annual
$-7,204/yr
Cap rate
5.40%
Cash-on-cash
-3.20%
DSCR
0.86
1% rule
0.95%
Cash to close
$225,232
Investor read
This is a 4 × 1-bed/1-bath units multifamily listed at $804k.
At list price, monthly cash flow is $-600 ($-7k/yr) — negative. Per door: $-150/mo.
To cash-flow at today's rent, offer at most $698k (13.2% below list).
To meet the 1% rule (rent ≥ 1% of price), the offer needs to be $763k (5.2% below list).
It's been on market 108 days — a 9% lower offer ($732k) is reasonable based on typical stale-listing flexibility.
Recommended offer: $698k (13.2% below list) — sets the bar for cash-flow.
Local home prices are declining (-3.0%/yr); year-one equity from $6k of loan paydown is wiped out by about $24k of value loss. Plan a longer hold.
Location reads 71/100 on livability (#224 in CA) — a middle-class / working-renter tenant base. Strengths: amenities A+, commute A+, employment A+; Watch: crime F, cost of living F.
Oakland Unified (urban): math 27% / reading 33% proficiency, ranked #1,007 of 1,400 in CA (top 72%) — families likely to look elsewhere, expect single-tenant / working-renter base with shorter leases; 68% free/reduced lunch — lower-income household profile, screen leases tightly.
Watch-outs: property tax is 3.1% of price; built in 1900 — expect roof / HVAC / electrical / plumbing capex.
Market conditions: Rents rising (+3.3%/yr); 109 active listings in the ZIP; 6 comparable units currently listed for rent nearby; rentals lingering (median 46d on market — plan ~5-8 weeks vacancy on turnover, expect pricing pressure); 50% of comp listings sitting > 30 days — soft ceiling on asking rent; high-income renter base; 1,742 units permitted in Alameda County in 2024 (856 in 5+ unit buildings).
Alameda County population projected at +34% by 2050 — long-run rental-demand tailwind backs the buy-and-hold thesis.
3 sale attempts since 22y ago; this cycle's ask has dropped $134k (14%) from the opening price — seller is motivated, your offer sets the floor, not the list.
Current owner paid $699k; 15% above their basis — modest negotiation headroom, anchor on the comps not their cost.
Cap rate 5.4% vs local median 2.5% in Oakland — top-decile yield for the area; either an underpriced asset or a hidden risk that comps aren't pricing in. Stress-test before assuming the spread holds.
At $7,626/mo this rent would consume 68% of the median local household income ($135k/yr) (locally 1614% of renters already pay >50% of income on rent) — very limited rent-growth headroom before tenants either downsize or default.
Questions for listing agent
What do current leases actually rent for vs. the listed asking? Can we see a recent rent roll and the last 12 months of T-12 income?
It's been on market 108 days. Have you received any prior offers? Is the seller open to a 13% concession, seller financing, or rate buy-down credit?
Can we see the unit-by-unit rent roll, current vacancy, and any below-market leases? What's the average tenancy length?
What capital expenditures (roof, boiler, parking lot, exteriors) have been made in the last 5 years, and what's planned in the next 2?
Built in 1900 — when were the roof, HVAC, electrical panel, plumbing, and water heater last replaced?
Property tax is high relative to price — has the assessment been appealed recently, and will the sale trigger a re-assessment?
Why hasn't it sold? Are there any deal-killer items the seller is aware of (foundation, flood, title, zoning, code violations)?
Is there a deadline driving the sale (1031 exchange, divorce, estate, relocation)? That informs how much negotiation room exists.
CashFlowRE · CFR-SVV0T76B83VNBS
· Data 1 day agocashflowre.app · 2026-05-29