1 bd · 1.0 ba ·
1,410 sqft ·
Built 1911
· MultiFamily
· Active
· 66 DOM
Cashflow @ list (25.0% down · 7.5%)
Estimated rent
$102,077/mo
Mortgage (P&I)
−$8,391
Tax + insurance
−$1,177
HOA
−$0
Vac / Maint / Mgmt
−$21,436
Net cashflow
$71,074/mo
Annual
$852,884/yr
Cap rate
59.60%
Cash-on-cash
190.38%
DSCR
9.47
1% rule
6.38%
Cash to close
$448,000
Investor read
This is a 1-bed/1.0-bath multifamily listed at $1.60M.
At list price, monthly cash flow is $71k ($853k/yr) — positive.
The deal already cash-flows at list — no discount required.
Meets the 1% rule at list price ($102k rent vs $1.60M).
It's been on market 66 days — a 6% lower offer ($1.50M) is reasonable based on typical stale-listing flexibility.
Recommended offer: $1.50M (6.0% below list) — sets the bar for market timing.
Local home prices are declining (-3.0%/yr); year-one equity from $11k of loan paydown is wiped out by about $48k of value loss. Plan a longer hold.
Location reads 60/100 on livability (#594 in CA) — a middle-class / working-renter tenant base. Strengths: commute A+, schools B+; Watch: employment C-, health & safety D, crime F.
Los Angeles Unified (urban): math 29% / reading 54% proficiency, ranked #223 of 517 in CA (top 43%) — families likely to look elsewhere, expect single-tenant / working-renter base with shorter leases; 67% free/reduced lunch — lower-income household profile, screen leases tightly.
Watch-outs: built in 1911 — expect roof / HVAC / electrical / plumbing capex.
Market conditions: Rents flat; 57 active listings in the ZIP; 6 comparable units currently listed for rent nearby; rentals at typical pace (median 14d on market — plan ~3-4 weeks tenant-placement turnaround); 19,697 units permitted in Los Angeles County in 2024 (9,426 in 5+ unit buildings).
Los Angeles County population projected at +9% by 2050 — modest demand growth; plan on rents tracking national, not racing it.
At projected returns (-3.0% appreciation + 0.2% rent growth), your $448k cash investment doubles in ~1 year — after that, you're playing with house money.
Cap rate 59.6% vs local median 3.7% in East Los Angeles — top-decile yield for the area; either an underpriced asset or a hidden risk that comps aren't pricing in. Stress-test before assuming the spread holds.
At $102,077/mo this rent would consume 2074% of the median local household income ($59k/yr) (locally 2670% of renters already pay >50% of income on rent) — very limited rent-growth headroom before tenants either downsize or default.
Questions for listing agent
It's been on market 66 days. Have you received any prior offers? Is the seller open to a 6% concession, seller financing, or rate buy-down credit?
Built in 1911 — when were the roof, HVAC, electrical panel, plumbing, and water heater last replaced?
Why hasn't it sold? Are there any deal-killer items the seller is aware of (foundation, flood, title, zoning, code violations)?
Is there a deadline driving the sale (1031 exchange, divorce, estate, relocation)? That informs how much negotiation room exists.
Schools are B-rated — typically a magnet for longer-tenancy family renters. What's the average tenant stay here, and is there a school-zone premium baked into asking?
Crime grade is F in this area — have there been break-ins, vandalism, or insurance claims at this property in the last 3 years? What carrier currently insures it and at what premium?
The area grade is low — what's the realistic commute time and amenity access for the typical tenant pool here? Any planned neighborhood developments (good or bad) we should know about?
What's the average days-on-market for RENTAL listings here right now (not sales)? A rising rental-DOM trend means longer vacancies and softer asking-rent achievability than the comps imply.
CashFlowRE · CFR-3RM4PP6B1XTSAV
· Data 2 days agocashflowre.app · 2026-05-29