3 bd · 2.0 ba ·
1,316 sqft ·
Built 1968
· SingleFamily
· Pending
· 19 DOM
Cashflow @ list (25.0% down · 7.5%)
Estimated rent
$1,958/mo
Mortgage (P&I)
−$1,704
Tax + insurance
−$358
HOA
−$0
Vac / Maint / Mgmt
−$411
Net cashflow
$-515/mo
Annual
$-6,185/yr
Cap rate
4.39%
Cash-on-cash
-6.80%
DSCR
0.70
1% rule
0.60%
Cash to close
$91,000
Investor read
This is a 3-bed/2.0-bath single-family listed at $325k.
At list price, monthly cash flow is $-515 ($-6k/yr) — negative.
To cash-flow at today's rent, offer at most $234k (28.0% below list).
To meet the 1% rule (rent ≥ 1% of price), the offer needs to be $196k (39.7% below list).
It's been on market 19 days — a 2% lower offer ($320k) is reasonable based on typical stale-listing flexibility.
Recommended offer: $196k (39.7% below list) — sets the bar for 1% rule.
In year one you build about $35k of equity ($2k loan paydown + $32k appreciation (10.0% local appreciation)).
Location reads 70/100 on livability (#307 in MI) — a middle-class / working-renter tenant base. Strengths: crime A+, cost of living A+, housing A+; Watch: amenities F, commute F, health & safety F.
Reeths-Puffer Schools (suburban): math 28% / reading 44% proficiency, ranked #254 of 540 in MI (top 47%) — families likely to look elsewhere, expect single-tenant / working-renter base with shorter leases.
Zoned schools: Twin Lake School (math 27% / reading 47%, grade F, #685 of 1,397 statewide, top 51%, 212 students, 57% FRL); Reethspuffer Middle School (math 29% / reading 54%, grade F, #192 of 493 statewide, top 39%, 542 students, 55% FRL); Reethspuffer High School (math 25% / reading 54%, grade F, #304 of 713 statewide, top 46%, 1,177 students, 53% FRL) — zoned schools average 55% FRL vs 40% district-wide (15 pts higher); higher-poverty schools than district average — tighter screening recommended.
Market conditions: 144 active listings in the ZIP; 438 units permitted in Muskegon County in 2024 (115 in 5+ unit buildings).
Muskegon County population projected to shrink 8% by 2050 — rents likely to lag national; underwrite the cash flow, not the appreciation.
3 sale attempts; this cycle's ask has dropped $25k (7%) from the opening price — seller is motivated, your offer sets the floor, not the list.
Current owner paid $84k; list at $325k implies a 287% gain — meaningful room to come down on a strong offer.
By year 2, paydown + projected appreciation supports a ~$56k cash-out refi (75% LTV) — recoverable capital for the next deal without selling this one.
Questions for listing agent
What do current leases actually rent for vs. the listed asking? Can we see a recent rent roll and the last 12 months of T-12 income?
Built in 1968 — when were the roof, HVAC, electrical panel, plumbing, and water heater last replaced?
Is there a deadline driving the sale (1031 exchange, divorce, estate, relocation)? That informs how much negotiation room exists.
The area grade is low — what's the realistic commute time and amenity access for the typical tenant pool here? Any planned neighborhood developments (good or bad) we should know about?
What's the average days-on-market for RENTAL listings here right now (not sales)? A rising rental-DOM trend means longer vacancies and softer asking-rent achievability than the comps imply.
What's the recent tenant-quality profile in this submarket — average credit score on applications, eviction rate, late-payment / NSF rate, and stable-employment percentage? A property-management company in the area should have these aggregated.
How much new for-sale + rental construction is in the pipeline within 1–3 miles? Heavy new supply typically softens prices + rents 12–24 months out; constrained supply supports both.
CashFlowRE · CFR-Q1D0N8592CSY9R
· Data 1 week agocashflowre.app · 2026-05-29